• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to the footer
Arbeidsadvocaat.nl

Arbeidsadvocaat.nl

We are nationwide modern attorneys who focus entirely on employment law. Choose legal advice at the highest level.

  • About
    • Team
    • The office
    • Fees
    • Vacancies
  • For employers
  • For employees
    • Settlement Agreement
    • Work-related accident
  • Lab
  • Contact
ONLINE INTAKE MEETING
  • About
    • Team
    • The office
    • Fees
    • Vacancies
  • For employers
  • For employees
    • Settlement Agreement
    • Work-related accident
  • Lab
  • Contact
ONLINE INTAKE MEETING

What is daydreaming and can it lead to dismissal?

Introduction

Day-dealing, or "stealing time" by employees, is taken seriously in employment law. Knowingly not working during paid hours can have far-reaching consequences. This blog explains what exactly constitutes day-dealing and how judges deal with such situations.

What is meant by daydreaming?

Dagdievery has several meanings, such as loafing, idleness and idleness. In the workplace, it means that an employee is "stealing" the employer's time. This happens, for example, when someone clocks in or logs on to work, but then does nothing, deliberately works less or even leaves the premises. While this may seem harmless, day-dealing is taken seriously in employment law and can lead to dismissal.

Daggery can have far-reaching consequences

A striking example from case law shows just how serious daytime theft can be. An employee worked in a building in which almost every door had to be opened with a personal access pass. Only the emergency door was freely accessible, intended for emergencies.

The employer noticed that the emergency door was being used remarkably often. This led to an internal investigation, which looked at the times employees checked in and out. One employee was notable for not using any of the normal doors after clocking in. Camera footage then showed that this employee regularly clocked in in the morning, left the building directly through the emergency door and did not return to clock out until the evening.

Thus, the employee was actually absent for the entire working day while formally registered as present.

Dismissal and no right to transition compensation

The district judge ruled that the employee had no good reason for his unauthorized absence. This behavior was qualified as seriously culpable. The dismissal was pronounced and the employee was additionally not entitled to a transitional compensation because he had seriously prejudiced his employer.

Although attendance checks can sometimes be sensitive because of privacy rules, privacy was not an issue in this case. The employee had not invoked it and, moreover, the checks were justified by suspicion of abuse.

What can you learn from this?

More and more employers are paying attention to correct use of work time, especially now that hybrid working and flexible working have become commonplace. Therefore, always make sure you are honest and transparent about your working hours and attendance. Day-dodging is not only unfair to your employer, but can also cost you your right to compensation and even your job.

Conclusion

Daggery is considered seriously culpable behavior and can lead to dismissal without entitlement to transfer compensation. Employers may conduct checks when there are serious suspicions of abuse. Honest recording of work time and attendance is essential to avoid employment law problems.


This blog was written by Mr. Stijn Blom, employment lawyer at Arbeidsadvocaat.nl B.V. Stijn has extensive experience in employment law and assists entrepreneurs daily with a wide range of employment-related matters. From dismissal cases to drafting watertight contracts and policies – with his practical and personal approach, he helps employers and employees move forward. Want to know more?Visit Stijn's page.

Arbeidsadvocaat.nl is happy to think with you if you have any questions about dagdievery. Please feel free to get in touch . 

April 2025

Footer

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

  • Privacy Policy
  • Complaints Procedure
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Register of Legal Expertise
  • VAT: NL855181044B01
  • 085 - 060 6499
  • EINDHOVEN OFFICE
  • ONLINE OFFICE
  • Whatsapp
  • Linkedin
  • Instagram
  • TikTok

Google Rating

© 2026 ARBEIDSADVOCAAT.NL

Copyright © 2026 · Stijn theme on the Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • Privacy Policy
  • Complaints Procedure
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Register of Legal Expertise
  • VAT: NL855181044B01
Arbeidsadvocaat.nl uses cookies
To provide the best browsing experience, this website uses functional and analytical cookies. Your anonymity is preserved. Third-party cookies will not be placed without your consent.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Analytical
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Management options
  • Management Services
  • Manage {vendor_count} suppliers
  • Learn more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • Nederlands