• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to the footer
Arbeidsadvocaat.nl

Arbeidsadvocaat.nl

We are nationwide modern attorneys who focus entirely on employment law. Choose legal advice at the highest level.

  • About
    • Team
    • The office
    • Fees
    • Vacancies
  • For employers
  • For employees
    • Settlement Agreement
    • Work-related accident
  • Lab
  • Contact
ONLINE INTAKE MEETING
  • About
    • Team
    • The office
    • Fees
    • Vacancies
  • For employers
  • For employees
    • Settlement Agreement
    • Work-related accident
  • Lab
  • Contact
ONLINE INTAKE MEETING

Instant dismissal due to food prank?

Introduction

A remarkable Burger King case shows that even seemingly minor incidents can lead to summary dismissal. This blog discusses why an employee was fired after serving a Whopper with an overdose of pickles and how the judge ruled on it.

The facts at Burger King

At Burger King's drive-thru in Aruba, a customer ordered a Whopper with extra pickles. Instead of the requested pickles, however, the customer received bacon on the burger. When she returned the bun and asked for pickles again, things went wrong again. This time, an employee had stuffed dozens of pickles into the burger, far more than usual. The customer took a picture of the bun and posted it with a complaint on Facebook.

Investigation and instant dismissal

Burger King launched an internal investigation into the incident. The employee responsible for the pickle overdose was subsequently fired with immediate effect. The employer felt that she had behaved unprofessionally and had thus damaged the company's image. The question arose whether this dismissal could legally stand.

Judge's verdict

The judge in Aruba, where Dutch labor law applies, ruled that the dismissal was justified. Professionally preparing food for others was seen by the judge as a serious and responsible task. The employee had shown that she was not fit to perform her job in a professional manner. In addition, her action had damaged Burger King's image. The immediate dismissal was therefore upheld. The employee also had to pay the legal costs of 1,800 euros.

Importance of this statement

Although this case seems funny at first glance, the ruling highlights an important employment law principle. Even relatively minor incidents can lead to summary dismissal if there are clear rules of conduct and if the trust between employer and employee has been seriously damaged.

arbeidsadvocaat.nl

Extraordinary dismissal at Burger King.... #labor arbeidsadvocaat #employment law #lawyer #rights

♬ original sound - Stijn Blom

This blog was written by Mr. Stijn Blom, employment lawyer at Arbeidsadvocaat.nl B.V. Stijn has extensive experience in employment law and assists entrepreneurs daily with a wide range of employment-related matters. From dismissal cases to drafting watertight contracts and policies – with his practical and personal approach, he helps employers and employees move forward. Want to know more?Visit Stijn's page.

Arbeidsadvocaat.nl is happy to think with you if you have any questions about XXX. Please feel free to contact us . 

April 2025

Footer

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

  • Privacy Policy
  • Complaints Procedure
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Register of Legal Expertise
  • VAT: NL855181044B01
  • 085 - 060 6499
  • EINDHOVEN OFFICE
  • ONLINE OFFICE
  • Whatsapp
  • Linkedin
  • Instagram
  • TikTok

Google Rating

© 2026 ARBEIDSADVOCAAT.NL

Copyright © 2026 · Stijn theme on the Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • Privacy Policy
  • Complaints Procedure
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Register of Legal Expertise
  • VAT: NL855181044B01
Arbeidsadvocaat.nl uses cookies
To provide the best browsing experience, this website uses functional and analytical cookies. Your anonymity is preserved. Third-party cookies will not be placed without your consent.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Analytical
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Management options
  • Management Services
  • Manage {vendor_count} suppliers
  • Learn more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • Nederlands