• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Arbeidsadvocaat.nl

Arbeidsadvocaat.nl

Arbeidsadvocaat.nl is a nationwide innovative law firm that combines specialized knowledge with digital solutions to provide employers and employees with accessible and efficient advice.

  • About
    • Team
    • About the firm
    • Fees
    • Vacancies
  • For employers
  • For employees
    • Review Settlement Agreement
    • Negotiate Settlement Agreement
  • Customer Portal
  • Blogs
  • Contact
ONLINE INTAKE MEETING
  • About
    • Team
    • About the firm
    • Fees
    • Vacancies
  • For employers
  • For employees
    • Review Settlement Agreement
    • Negotiate Settlement Agreement
  • Customer Portal
  • Blogs
  • Contact
ONLINE INTAKE MEETING

May a search firm be called in when sick?

May an employer use a search firm for sick leave?

In some cases, an employer may doubt the sincerity of an employee who calls in sick. How far may an employer go in monitoring sick leave, and what legal limits should be observed? In this article, we discuss a notable case revolving around the use of an investigative agency in sick leave.

Engage investigative experts in sick leave cases

In a case involving the delivery company PieterPot, which delivers durable groceries, an employee was reported sick with neck pain. Doubting the legality of the sick leave, the company decided to hire a detective agency to follow the employee. The agency found that her neck moved smoothly when she walked outside and even while looking at her phone. Furthermore, she was spotted at a festival, where she was actively dancing and even headbanging. She also appeared to be lifting heavy items, such as garbage and cat food.

Given the observations, PieterPot decided to fire the employee with immediate effect.

Judge rules on dismissal

The employee disagreed with the dismissal and went to court. She claimed several severance payments. The judge held that the summary dismissal was not justified. PieterPot had not properly substantiated the use of the detective agency. A detective agency may only be used if there is concrete evidence of serious misconduct or abuse of sick leave. In this case, PieterPot had only acted on a "gut feeling," which was not sufficient grounds for dismissal. Engaging the agency was disproportionate.

Moreover, PieterPot should have consulted the company doctor to verify whether the employee was actually able to perform the activities she was performing, such as lifting heavy objects and dancing at a festival. Not consulting the company doctor was considered a lapse on the part of the employer.

Effects on the employer

Ultimately, the judge ruled that the dismissal was not justified and awarded the employee severance pay of approximately 30,000 euros. This case highlights how important it is for employers to act carefully when considering using a search firm. It is essential that there be clear and substantial evidence of abuse before such steps are taken. Moreover, employers should always follow proper procedures, such as consulting a company doctor.

arbeidsadvocaat.nl

This week's ruling!👀 arbeidsadvocaat #lawyer #labor law

♬ original sound - Stijn Blom

This blog was written by Mr. Stijn Blom, employment lawyer at Arbeidsadvocaat.nl B.V. Stijn has extensive experience in employment law and assists entrepreneurs daily with a wide range of employment-related matters. From dismissal cases to drafting watertight contracts and policies – with his practical and personal approach, he helps employers and employees move forward. Want to know more?Visit Stijn's page.

Arbeidsadvocaat.nl is happy to think with you if you have questions about dismissal law. Please feel free to contact us . 

April 2025

Footer

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

  • Privacy Policy
  • Complaints Procedure
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Register of Legal Expertise
  • VAT: NL855181044B01
  • 085 - 060 6499
  • EINDHOVEN OFFICE
  • ONLINE OFFICE
  • Whatsapp
  • Linkedin
  • Instagram
  • TikTok

Google Rating

5.0 55 reviews

© 2025 Arbeidsadvocaat.nl

Copyright © 2025 - Stijn theme on Genesis Framework - WordPress - Log in.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Complaints Procedure
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Register of Legal Expertise
  • VAT: NL855181044B01
Arbeidsadvocaat.nl uses cookies
To provide the best browsing experience, this website uses functional and analytical cookies. Your anonymity is preserved. Third-party cookies will not be placed without your consent.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Analytical
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
  • Nederlands