• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Arbeidsadvocaat.nl

Arbeidsadvocaat.nl

Arbeidsadvocaat.nl is a nationwide innovative law firm that combines specialized knowledge with digital solutions to provide employers and employees with accessible and efficient advice.

  • About
    • Team
    • About the firm
    • Fees
    • Vacancies
  • For employers
  • For employees
    • Review Settlement Agreement
    • Negotiate Settlement Agreement
  • Customer Portal
  • Blogs
  • Contact
ONLINE INTAKE MEETING
  • About
    • Team
    • About the firm
    • Fees
    • Vacancies
  • For employers
  • For employees
    • Review Settlement Agreement
    • Negotiate Settlement Agreement
  • Customer Portal
  • Blogs
  • Contact
ONLINE INTAKE MEETING

No instant dismissal due to hugging culture

Unwanted intimacies

This 2017 ruling by the Court of Appeal in The Hagueis perhaps one of the most remarkable decisions in employment law. The case involved a chef who, just before retirement, was summarily dismissed for unwanted sexual intimacies with female colleagues. He had touched the breasts and buttocks of co-workers. The subdistrict court upheld the dismissal after hearing seven witnesses, ruling that the chef had behaved improperly and abused his managerial position.

Hague Court of Appeal

The Court of Appeal in The Hague reached a different conclusion. According to the court, the company had a hugging culture. The atmosphere was relaxed, and hugging upon arrival and a collegial arm around the shoulder were normal practices. Both the chef and the co-workers participated in this. According to the court, while touching breasts and buttocks was indeed unacceptable, the company's management should have earlier reminded the chef, as an older employee with actual leadership over the kitchen, of his responsibilities. Management should have given him the opportunity to improve his behavior.

The court also found from witness statements that the female employees themselves often initiated the hugging, had never indicated to the chef that they were uncomfortable, and still had sympathy for him. All things considered, the Court of Appeal ruled that the summary dismissal had gone too far. The employer should have given a serious warning instead.

This case took place in 2017. It is questionable whether judges would be as lenient in 2023.


This blog was written by Mr. Stijn Blom, employment lawyer at Arbeidsadvocaat.nl B.V. Stijn has extensive experience in employment law and assists entrepreneurs daily with a wide range of employment-related matters. From dismissal cases to drafting watertight contracts and policies – with his practical and personal approach, he helps employers and employees move forward. Want to know more?Visit Stijn's page.

Arbeidsadvocaat.nl is happy to think with you if you have questions about dismissal law. Please feel free to contact us.  

June 2024  

Footer

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

  • Privacy Policy
  • Complaints Procedure
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Register of Legal Expertise
  • VAT: NL855181044B01
  • 085 - 060 6499
  • EINDHOVEN OFFICE
  • ONLINE OFFICE
  • Whatsapp
  • Linkedin
  • Instagram
  • TikTok

Google Rating

5.0 55 reviews

© 2025 Arbeidsadvocaat.nl

Copyright © 2025 - Stijn theme on Genesis Framework - WordPress - Log in.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Complaints Procedure
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Register of Legal Expertise
  • VAT: NL855181044B01
Arbeidsadvocaat.nl uses cookies
To provide the best browsing experience, this website uses functional and analytical cookies. Your anonymity is preserved. Third-party cookies will not be placed without your consent.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Analytical
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
  • Nederlands