• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to the footer
Arbeidsadvocaat.nl

Arbeidsadvocaat.nl

We are nationwide modern attorneys who focus entirely on employment law. Choose legal advice at the highest level.

  • About
    • Team
    • The office
    • Fees
    • Vacancies
  • For employers
  • For employees
    • Settlement Agreement
    • Work-related accident
  • Lab
  • Contact
ONLINE INTAKE MEETING
  • About
    • Team
    • The office
    • Fees
    • Vacancies
  • For employers
  • For employees
    • Settlement Agreement
    • Work-related accident
  • Lab
  • Contact
ONLINE INTAKE MEETING

Equalizing employment conditions after merger or acquisition: legal pitfalls

In a merger or acquisition, employees with different working conditions come to work under one roof. This regularly leads to imbalances and frustration in the workplace. It is therefore understandable that employers want to harmonize terms of employment. However, this is not always legally permissible. Especially during a transfer of undertaking, strict rules apply that employers often overlook in practice.

Transfer of undertaking: protection of employees

When a takeover involves a transfer of undertaking within the meaning of the law, the employees are automatically transferred to the new employer, while maintaining their existing terms and conditions of employment. This protection mechanism is mandatory: employees cannot opt out even if they do not lose out. Any proposal to change working conditions related to the transfer can be annulled later.

In a takeover via share transfer, this protection does not apply because the employer remains formally the same. In that case, the normal rules for changing employment conditions can be applied.

Harmonization after transition: timing and motivation crucial

The desire to equalize terms of employment is understandable, especially if differences create internal tensions or red tape. Yet this desire may not result directly from the transfer of undertaking. Harmonization is prohibited in that case, even if the employee does not lose out on paper.

If an employer still wants to change terms of employment, it should be based on a different reason and preferably only some time after the transition. The link between transition and change must be blurred. The longer one waits, the more likely a change proposal will stand.

Change by consent: offering benefits helps

If there is no direct link to the transition, conditions of employment can be adjusted, provided the employee agrees. With deteriorations, this is more difficult, but not impossible. Employers can ease the pain with a phasing-out arrangement or a one-time bonus upon consent. If improvements are involved, consent will usually not be a problem.

Unilateral modification: high threshold

Sometimes an employee is unwilling to agree. Then the employer can invoke a unilateral modification clause, if it is included in the employment contract. Even then, there must be a compelling interest, such as financial distress or reorganization. Merely striving for equal employment conditions is not sufficient for this.

Without a change clause, the employer can try to invoke good employment practice. In doing so, the proposal must be reasonable and arise from changed circumstances within the organization. The employee may then not refuse without good reason.

Works council not forgotten

In some cases, the works council has the right of consent when changing terms and conditions of employment, such as pay systems or working hours. Although the Works Council's consent does not have a legally binding effect on individual employees, a positive opinion does weigh in when assessing whether a proposal is reasonable. Therefore, involve the Works Council in good time.

Conclusion: harmonizing can be done, but not just like that

Harmonizing working conditions after a merger or acquisition requires care. If there is a transfer of undertaking, the rights of employees are legally protected and may not be changed just like that. Without consent, a change can only succeed if strict conditions are met. Therefore, wait with harmonization until the transition is sufficiently behind you, motivate the change well and involve both employees and the works council in the process. Only then will there be the greatest chance of a sustainable and legally tenable harmonization.


This blog was written by mr. Stijn Blom, employment lawyer at Arbeidsadvocaat.nl B.V. Stijn has extensive experience in employment law and supports entrepreneurs and employees on a daily basis with a variety of employment law issues. From dismissal cases to drafting watertight contracts and regulations - with his practical and personal approach, he helps employers and employees move forward. Want to know more? Visit Stijn's page.

Arbeidsadvocaat.nl is happy to think with you if you have questions about transgressive behavior. Please feel free to contact us . 

April 2025

Footer

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

  • Privacy Policy
  • Complaints Procedure
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Register of Legal Expertise
  • VAT: NL855181044B01
  • 085 - 060 6499
  • EINDHOVEN OFFICE
  • ONLINE OFFICE
  • Whatsapp
  • Linkedin
  • Instagram
  • TikTok

Google Rating

© 2026 ARBEIDSADVOCAAT.NL

Copyright © 2026 · Stijn theme on the Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • Privacy Policy
  • Complaints Procedure
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Register of Legal Expertise
  • VAT: NL855181044B01
Arbeidsadvocaat.nl uses cookies
To provide the best browsing experience, this website uses functional and analytical cookies. Your anonymity is preserved. Third-party cookies will not be placed without your consent.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Analytical
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Management options
  • Management Services
  • Manage {vendor_count} suppliers
  • Learn more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • Nederlands